Subjects: Statistics >> Social Statistics submitted time 2024-03-27 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract: In May 2013, with the release of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) as a symbol, the reform of international research evaluation began. Over the past decade, the reform of international research evaluation has undergone extensive theoretical preparation and initiatives, and is now moving towards practice. More than 350 institutions from over 40 countries have signed agreements to reform research evaluation and carried out pilot reforms, with initial results. This study systematically summarizes and analyzes the ten-year reform of international research evaluation in three aspects: reform goals, measures, and cases. From the perspective of comparing with China’s research evaluation reform, research conclusions and inspirations are drawn.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-28 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract: Over the past decade, there have been many scientific and technological evaluation reform documents and great efforts represented by “Three Evaluations” and breaking “Four Only”, which have achieved good results but the gap is still huge. This reform has better eliminated the surface problems such as unreasonable evaluation quantity, frequency, and index in the “Three Evaluations”. The reform has been initiated in the reward system, talent plan, and project fund management, but is still halfway. The reform of scientific and technological evaluation has not yet achieved a fundamental improvement in the value orientation of guiding scientific researchers to pursue excellence from the bottom, and the problem of new evaluation approach remains to be solved.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-28 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract: In the institute evaluation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the international evaluation was started in 2004 and officially carried out in 2012. International evaluation has become an important means in the expert diagnostic evaluation on “One-Three-Five”. Since 2016, the international evaluation has been extended to the research evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence. This study reviews the development of international evaluation of institute evaluation of CAS, and introduces and discusses the important processes and the main impact of international evaluation. Finally, three key issues of international evaluation are discussed and the future development prospects are put forward.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-28 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract: In 2018, the state issued breaking the “Siwei” related document, while “Siwei” means only papers, only titles, only education back ground, and only awards, and five ministries and institutions, i.e., Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Chinese Academy of Engineering, collaboratedly started the special action of breaking “Siwei”. Most researchers in universities and research institutions have both expectations and concerns. There are different opinions on how to break the “Siwei” into a hot topic. Based on the introduction and analysis of the development and evolution of more than 20-year research institute evaluation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), this study holds that the research institute evaluation of CAS has gone out a road of breaking the “Siwei” and formed the CAS mode, thus providing a way of thinking for how to break the “Siwei” from the perspective of practical cases.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2017-08-21 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract:科技评价问题成为久攻不破的堡垒,学界、政府和社会不断争议和探索,正如百万迁徙角马在跨越马拉河前的徘徊与尝试。文章分析提出我国科技评价问题难以解决的根本原因在于没有厘清政府与科学的关系,没有处理好整体推进和重点突破的关系,没有赋予处于学术高地机构以特殊政策和自主权,使之发挥“领头角马”的作用,率先实现从“此岸”到“彼岸”的跨越,构建起以追求卓越为价值导向的评价体系。由此,文章尝试提出科技评价改革的“领头角马”理论,即发挥好“领头角马”的作用是科技评价改革的突破口之所在,并结合我国实际提出相应的政策建议。