Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-10-08 Cooperative journals: 《知识管理论坛》
Abstract：知识管理中心（KMCenter）成立于 2001 年， 是以知识管理研究、咨询服务为主营业务的机 构，致力于推动知识管理落地。其创始人田志 刚先生更是有着丰富的知识管理研究和实践经 验，不仅主持知识管理的实施项目，帮助组织 和专业人员解决知识管理问题，还开展知识管 理培训，出版专著。田主任对《知识管理论坛》 的成长也十分关注，欣然接受了我们的采访邀 请。在 2 月最后一天阳光灿烂的午后，田主任 田志刚 刚从外地调研结束回京，虽风尘仆仆，但精神 奕奕，带着最新的调研成果与我们侃侃而谈。
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-08-26 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] As the "gatekeeper" of scholarly journals, the peer review has been criticized for lacking the transparency quality assurance. The open peer review, to some extent, could overcome the limitation and live up to the demands of open science and giving reviewers credit. Thus, it is critical for journals to investigate the attitudes of researchers towards the open peer review before it is implemented.[Method/process]Based on the literature review, we firstly defined the concept, the pros and cons of the open peer review; then, we conducted an online survey focusing on the information disclosure willingness during the open review process of respondents, and analyzed the collected data.[Result/conclusion]304 valid questionnaires from China have been received. All respondents have authored papers and 70% of them have peer review experience, including 40% have review experience for international journals. The result indicates that about half (50.33%) of the Chinese researchers maintain a positive attitude towards the open peer review, and the degree of acceptance varies at different stages of the open peer review process. While the discipline of researchers affects their attitudes towards the open peer review, the peer review experience for international journals makes little difference on the results. The results and analysis in this study could serve as a reference for Chinese journals to put the open peer review into practice.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Aiming at the privacy problems in the current scientific data sharing of China, this paper explored the privacy governance methods and countermeasures in order to realize the scientific data sharing better.[Method/process] On the basis of clarifying the privacy problems in scientific data sharing, this paper proposed four principles of privacy governance, constructed a privacy governance model, and explored countermeasures for privacy governance in scientific data sharing by using the methods of literature survey and modelling.[Result/conclusion] Privacy governance can be implemented by improving the legal system of privacy protection, strengthening the construction of supporting system of privacy protection, adopting privacy enhancement technologies, improving the privacy literacy of stakeholders, establishing rules of privacy ethics protection, and strengthening the process management of scientific data to effectively promote scientific data sharing.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] This paper aims to reveal the utilization status of the three representative datasets in Peking University Open Research Data Platform and provide references for the related research of scientific data open sharing.[Method/process] This paper selected CNKI papers using CFPS, CHARLS and CLHLS as the research objects, and adopted network analysis method and relevant tools to analyze their collaborative research from the dimensions of authors, institutions and themes.[Result/conclusion] After 2011, the annual collaboration degree of the research subjects has tended to be stable, and the collaboration rate gradually decreased with the expansion of the research subjects. The three centrality indicators can complement each other to find important institutions. The first-level institutions show that Peking University is the core, some institutions maintain collaboration, and many institutions actively participate in collaboration. The top-ranked second-level institutions in terms of the number of collaborative institutions and the total number of collaboration times are relatively stable, and maintain a solid collaborative relationship mutually, which can be roughly classified into three categories. The core author groups show that some author groups collaborate frequently and stably, and there are intermediary authors connecting to several collaborative groups. Moreover, collaborative research papers cover a variety of topics, focusing on physical and mental health of elderly people, family consumption and assets, as well as social security issues for the aging population. It can be improved in terms of building an authoritative integration platform of scientific data open sharing, integrating academic databases, and organizing academic competitions to promote the development of scientific data open sharing in the future.
Hits
YES
Hits
Downloads
Comment