Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-10-08 Cooperative journals: 《知识管理论坛》
Abstract：[ 目的 / 意义 ] 旨在系统介绍南京大学叶继元教授出版的著作《学术“全评价”体系论》，并对 其进行深入评价，以帮助读者更好地理解该书特色。[ 方法 / 过程 ] 首先从国家战略需求角度评价该书的战 略价值，然后深入剖析该书的结构和主要内容，以此总结全书的特色、贡献与影响。[ 结果 / 结论 ] 该书构 建了以六大要素、三个维度和六大推论等组成的学术“全评价”体系，是作者 10 余年在学术“全评价”领 域深耕的成果。该体系高度契合国家繁荣发展哲学社会科学的重大战略需求，具有重要的理论价值和现实 指导意义。
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-10-08 Cooperative journals: 《知识管理论坛》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Through the analysis of the conference information in the field of library and information science, this research analyses the current situation and distribution characteristics of academic conferences in the field of library and information science, and reveal the development of LIS. [Method/process] This research discovers the development of the conference by collecting the information of the “meetings of LIS” from August 31, 2019 to August 31, 2020, the basic information and the communication of the conference. Used quantitative research methods to analyze the meeting time, location, organizer, etc.; explored the difference in attention between domestic and foreign and different platform meetings; conducted text mining on the theme and background of the meeting to reveal features of academic conferences in the new era. [Result/conclusion] The research found that offline academic conferences for LIS are mainly held on weekends, and there is no fixed time for online conferences. The venues are mainly concentrated on universities or cities with rich resources in the subject of LIS, such as Wuhan, Beijing and Shanghai. Scholars pay more attention on foreign conferences than domestic conferences. The conference was held around the innovation, wisdom, integration and openness, and the content of meetings has become increasingly rich.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-10-08 Cooperative journals: 《知识管理论坛》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Scientometrics and informetrics respectively belong to science of science and information science, and they have coincidence in theory, methods and technology applications. The analysis of the similarities and differences between these two can help to deepen understanding, and help to accurately grasp the meaning and direction of the relevant terms. [Method/process] This paper collected the samples of scientometrics and informetrics from the aspects of representative journals and keyword retrieval. It also compared the similarities and differences of the distribution of publications and cooperation between the two subjects from the perspective of states, organizations and authors, clustering keywords to analyze the similarities and differences of subject structures between the two subjects. The citation behavior and knowledge flow of these two were compared from the perspectives of literature co-citation, author cocitation, journal co-citation and subject overlay diagram. [Result/conclusion] It is found that although the studies of scientometrics and informetrics are similar in general, there are many differences in detail.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-04-04
Abstract： Purpose/Significance This paper attempts to address the four questions of establishing an independent knowledge system for information resources management discipline, e.g., "why is it necessary", "what is the basis", "what challenges are faced" and "how to promote it", so as to provide a reference for its construction. Method/Process Based on the development status and mission of the discipline, combined with the times, the demand for building an independent knowledge system was extracted from the international, domestic and disciplinary levels, the foundation and constraints of its construction were analyzed, and its construction strategies were put forward. Result/Conclusion To establish an independent knowledge system in the field of information resources management, it is important to understand its key features and follow the three principles. Specifically, there are six paths, such as accelerating the breaking of apprenticeship mindset, strengthening consensus on discipline development and emphasizing the excavation of historical essence.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-11-05 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract： ［Purpose/significance］At present, the development of China think tanks has entered a climax, but the overall level of think tanks should be improved. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the gaps of think tanks’ development that exist in the United States and China, and provide experience for the Chinese think tanks’ construction. ［Method/process］According to 2015 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report and 2015 China Think Tank Report, we selected the top 48 think tanks in China and the US. Then, we made a comparative analysis in terms of the type, the operation mode, the research field, the service mode and network applications of think tanks. At last, we pointed out the insufficiency of Chinese think tanks.［Result/conclusion］On this basis, we put forward four suggestions for Chinese think tank construction: the Chinese think tank should be the optimization of its development structure, improve the operation mode, ameliorate the research reform and strengthen the propaganda to promote its development.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-07-13 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract：[目的/意义]目前我国智库发展进入一个高潮,但智库总体水平还有待提高。因此,有必要分析中美两国智库发展中存在的差距,为中国智库建设提供经验借鉴。[方法/过程]本文根据《2015年全球智库报告》和《2015年中国智库报告》,选取中美两国48家顶尖智库,对智库的类型、运行模式、研究领域、服务方式和网络应用情况等方面进行了比较分析。[结果/结论]指出目前中国智库发展存在的不足,并在此基础上提出对中国智库建设的4点启示,认为中国智库应该从优化智库发展结构、改善智库运行模式、改革智库研究领域和加强智库宣传等方面进行发展完善。
Hits
YES
Hits
Downloads
Comment