Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-07-04
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] To analyze the attitudes, measures and policies of the current academic publishing community in the face of artificial intelligence（AI） tools represented by ChatGPT, and to provide reference for the construction of academic publishing policy system in the context of AI4Science.[Method/process] The policies/statements of academic publishers on the use of AI tools were systematically scanned and analyzed by using the internet/literature research method and content analysis method. [Result/conclusion] Different academic publishers respond to the use of AI tools at different speeds, but their concerns and key policy factors are relatively consistent. However, as to policy/statement key terms and specific operations, various types of academic publishers show great differences. The academic publishing community's response to the use of AI tools will still be in the stage of continuous exploration and debugging. All academic publishers should strengthen communication and coordination, actively formulate a policy framework to deal with the use of AI tools, and clarify the definitions, connotations, and boundaries of key policy elements and key terms. The academic community should be fully linked to build a policy system on the use of AI tools.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-06-14
Abstract：【目的】通过梳理国际代表性数据期刊特点!更好地了解数据期刊发展的趋势和特征。 【方法】 选择15种数据期刊进行调研，对其发展现状、学科分布、出版方式、收录内容、引用机制、版权协议以及出版费用等方面进行了分析%。【结果】基于 Scientific Data、F1000 Reaseach、GigaScience 等代表性期刊的分析，成功的数据期刊特点包括科研人员的认知度、学术社群的认可度、知识产权保护以及管理透明化。【结论】中国数据期刊出版界在搭建数据知识库和数据期刊出版平台后，还需关注如何提升国际认知度和认可度，图书馆员除了为科研人员推荐这些开放获取的数据资源外，更重要的是协助他们鉴别良好的数据期刊，以保护他们的知识产权权益。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment