Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-07-09 Cooperative journals: 《中国科学院院刊》
Abstract： Open science has reached a global consensus, and global open science governance requires the active participation of China. In order to seize development opportunities, this study analyzes the global trend of open science development and its impact on the scientific community. Based on practical cases of open science in China, the current situation and challenges of open science development in China are addressed. A roadmap for open science in China is designed, with open research infrastructure and open science policies as key supports. Recommendations for promoting the development of open science in China are proposed.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Grasping the development and abnormal situation of global OA Sci-Tech journals' APC in time is helpful to avoid the loss of domestic research funding, assist decision-making, and provide a reference for China to determine the development path for open access and open science.[Method/process] This paper used the least square method to fit the functional relationship between the APC unit price and influence index of OA journals, and set a 95% confidence interval to identify premium journals and non-premium journals. Based on this principle, a global OA Sci-Tech journals' APC monitoring and anomaly early warning model was established.[Result/conclusion] The model includes automatic acquisition, monitoring analysis, and anomaly early warning modules. Take OA journals data published by an institute of physics in the Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example, it was found that premium journals accounted for 43.5%, and 4.46% of abnormal APCs required early warning. However, 90% of the papers were published in non-premium journals with high cost performance, and non-premium journals were not in the Beall's List, premium journal classification conforms to the inclusion of GoOA and DOAJ,which verified the validity and reliability of the model.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-31 Cooperative journals: 《农业图书情报学报》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] Open science is shaping a new academic innovation ecology, aiming to promote open exchange and use of knowledge, emphasize open and cooperative research methods, and thus accelerate scientific innovation. Open innovation emphasizes the flow of knowledge across organizational boundaries. Both of them have obvious internal consistency and regard the free flow of knowledge as the driving factor of innovation. However, there are few studies on the relationship between open science and open innovation at present. They are often studied separately in the scientific research environment and the enterprise environment, ignoring the common role and integration of the two in the open innovation ecology. This paper aims to analyze the consistency of the connotation of open science and open innovation, study the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology, and provide reference for building an open science innovation ecology integrating open science and open innovation, as well as for developing open science governance for scientific and technological innovation. [Method/Process] First, based on the existing connotation of open science, this paper established the connotation analysis framework of "resource-process-subject-behavior" of open science, and put forward four key elements and principles of open science: "openness of scientific knowledge resources - transparency of research process - inclusiveness of participants - collaboration of research behavior". Then it de-constructed open innovation according to the connotation analysis framework of open science, and put forward four key elements of innovation knowledge resources, innovation process, innovation subject and innovation activities, as well as the principle of transparent and open innovation knowledge resources and innovation process, and value of co-creation based on the inclusiveness of innovation subject. Finally, according to the four principles of open science, the "Open Science Spectrum" was established to clarify the consistency and synergy of both sides from the perspective of openness. Besides, in order to understand the joint action mechanism of open science and open innovation in the innovation ecology, this paper analyzes the open science innovation mechanism in different innovation stages from the perspective of innovation process, including the open science mechanism in the open science research stage, the mechanism in the technology research and development stage, the citizen science mechanism in the social inclusion stage, and the responsible innovation mechanism covering the whole process of innovation. [Results/Conclusions] The innovation ecology of open science has come into being. Open science and open innovation have consistency in connotation and synergy in openness. Under the open science innovation ecology, open science plays a role in different stages of innovation. Explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are open and flowing in different stages of innovation, accelerating open science innovation, open innovation, public innovation and responsible innovation. The inadequacy of this paper is that the relevant research is still at the theoretical level. For example, the spectrum of open science needs to be refined to an assessable and operable granularity, and the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology also needs more cases to verify. At the same time, based on this research, we need to further explore the governance mechanism of open science under the innovation system and the linkage strategy of science, industry, society and policy under the open innovation ecology.
Subjects: Psychology >> Cognitive Psychology submitted time 2023-03-13
Abstract：
Evidence has shown that self-control is not only an effort to inhibit impulses, but people also actively promote successful self-control through the application of various self-control strategies. The process model of self-control are considered to include the majority of self-control strategies, but the hypothesis that early strategies are more effective than late ones requires further investigation. In daily life, people usually applies at least one strategy to resist desire, and they also apply different strategies according to different desire types and situations. The effectiveness of strategy used will vary due to individual differences, desire types, situations, and other factors. Future research needs to deeply explore the flexibility and variability of the application of self-control strategies, the mechanism of applying multiple strategies, with a focus on the relationship between self-control strategies and the improvement of self-control ability, and improve intervention research on the application of self-control strategies.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-10-28
Abstract： Purpose/Significance Open science is shaping a new academic innovation ecology, aiming to promote open exchange and use of knowledge, emphasize open and cooperative research methods, and thus accelerate scientific innovation. Open innovation emphasizes the flow of knowledge across organizational boundaries. Both of them have obvious internal consistency and regard the free flow of knowledge as the driving factor of innovation. However, there are few studies on the relationship between open science and open innovation at present. They are often studied separately in the scientific research environment and the enterprise environment, ignoring the common role and integration of the two in the open innovation ecology. This paper aims to analyze the consistency of the connotation of open science and open innovation, study the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology, and provide reference for building an open science innovation ecology integrating open science and open innovation, as well as for developing open science governance for scientific and technological innovation. Method/Process First, based on the existing connotation of open science, this paper established the connotation analysis framework of "resource-process-subject-behavior" of open science, and put forward four key elements and principles of open science: "openness of scientific knowledge resources - transparency of research process - inclusiveness of participants - collaboration of research behavior". Then it de-constructed open innovation according to the connotation analysis framework of open science, and put forward four key elements of innovation knowledge resources, innovation process, innovation subject and innovation activities, as well as the principle of transparent and open innovation knowledge resources and innovation process, and value of co-creation based on the inclusiveness of innovation subject. Finally, according to the four principles of open science, the "Open Science Spectrum" was established to clarify the consistency and synergy of both sides from the perspective of openness. Besides, in order to understand the joint action mechanism of open science and open innovation in the innovation ecology, this paper analyzes the open science innovation mechanism in different innovation stages from the perspective of innovation process, including the open science mechanism in the open science research stage, the mechanism in the technology research and development stage, the citizen science mechanism in the social inclusion stage, and the responsible innovation mechanism covering the whole process of innovation. Results/Conclusions The innovation ecology of open science has come into being. Open science and open innovation have consistency in connotation and synergy in openness. Under the open science innovation ecology, open science plays a role in different stages of innovation. Explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are open and flowing in different stages of innovation, accelerating open science innovation, open innovation, public innovation and responsible innovation. The inadequacy of this paper is that the relevant research is still at the theoretical level. For example, the spectrum of open science needs to be refined to an assessable and operable granularity, and the mechanism of open science for innovation ecology also needs more cases to verify. At the same time, based on this research, we need to further explore the governance mechanism of open science under the innovation system and the linkage strategy of science, industry, society and policy under the open innovation ecology.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2019-03-17
Abstract： The paper sorts out the development trends of the international preprint servers; analyzes the policy trends of preprint servers, funding agencies and journals; brings forth the five policy challenges faced in developing Chinese preprint servers: unclear policy positioning, imperfect policy mechanism, lack of high-level management policies, lack of policy support from journals, and insufficient policy starting point; make four suggestions in the development preprint servers in China. "
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-11-21
Abstract： The preprint policy of international academic publishers has an important influence on the preprint development. This paper classifies the preprint policy of academic publishers as submission policy and self-archive policy, and summarizes five models of pre-printed policy .With the web of science as the data source, a typical analysis of the journals/publishersthat has the most papers from China is made.It is found that most of the international academic publishers have adopted positive pre-printing policies, and present certain characteristics.Finally, according to the analysis results of preprint policy, corresponding suggestions are put forward from the perspectives of scientific research authors, periodicals and Chinaxiv.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-11-21
Abstract： To protect the priority right of the authors and to promote the excellent scientific research articles first preserved and serve for other researchers in our country, Scientific Article Preprint Platform of Chinese Academy Science (ChinaXiv) is proposed to build. It aims to encourage researchers to share their articles on public preprints platform in the first time，and receive peer reviews and suggestions for a wider range of academic communication. Based on the practice and strategic plan of ChinaXiv construction, this paper describes how to build a preprint platform following the international standard operation regulation, including construction background, system construction and service, domain development and cultivation, organization and management mechanism, propagandizing and popularizing mode, development status and future. This paper can provide references for other preprint repositories.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-11-06
Abstract： Influenced by Open Access Movement and Open Science, preprints and the scholarly communication based on preprint servers have received great attention from the scientific community. This paper summarizes the status of the international preprint serversince 2013 and proposes seven main trends of current international preprint development. It is found out that traditional preprint servers, such as arXiv and SSRN, have seen gorgeousachievements by exploringa sustainable development model. Also, some new preprint servers, such as bioRxiv, ChemRxiv, have sprung up like mushrooms in recent years, bringing prosperity for preprint servers. Moreover, for scientific community, the scholarly communication model with manuscripts of research articles has won widely recognition from academic groups, societies, science and technology management institutions, the IMF, and even the traditional publishers. It indicates that the scholarly communication based on the preprints is changing the traditional scholarly communication model in which journals are as the main body.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-10-23
Abstract： In the context of open publishing, this paper takes 10 typical open access mega-journal as the cases, with reference to the information of journal official websites, JCR (Journal Citation Report) and Scopus, and it analyzes the development status of 10 open access mega-journal from 5 aspects: impact factor, article volumes, article-processing charge, acceptance rate, publishing speed; then it discussion long-term positive influence and possible problems of open access mega-journal. The results of this study can be a reference for authors publishing in open access mega-journal and offer the enlightenment to journal policy-making.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-09-29
Abstract：[目的/意义]全球开放获取期刊的发展越来越受重视，持续关注全球开放获取期刊的进展为我国开放获取期刊的发展提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]对2016年世界重要开放获取期刊利益相关者，包括政府机构、科研资助机构、科研教育机构、出版商、国际组织、学/协会等进行动态跟踪和扫描，整理并分析2016年全球开放获取期刊的最新发展趋势和热点问题。[结果/结论]2016年全球开放获取期刊繁荣发展，并得到多方利益相关者的支持和推动，开放获取期刊的发展也面临一些问题和挑战，如开放获取期刊的质量问题、巨型开放获取期刊的未来发展问题。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-05-12
Abstract：以 Mehrdad Jalalian 最近更新的劫持性期刊列表及 Jeffrey Beall 所公布的劫持性期刊摘要：以 Mehrdad Jalalian 最近更新的劫持性期刊列表及 Jeffrey Beall 所公布的劫持性期刊为数据源，结合 Mehrdad Jalalian 个人主页、期刊网页信息、乌利希国际期刊指南、JCR报告等，对劫持性期刊相关信息进行调研。从期刊网址、影响因子、国别和地区分布、期刊语种和学科分布、期刊类型等方面总结了劫持性期刊的特点，分析了该现象产生原因和带来的危害，总结出识别和应对劫持性期刊的方法。为期刊界、信息服务机构、作者识别和应对劫持性期刊现象提供参考和借鉴。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-06-20
Abstract：[摘 要] 开展开放科技资源建设对促进科技资源的传播和利用，提升图书馆的信息服务能力有重大意义。[摘 要] 开展开放科技资源建设对促进科技资源的传播和利用，提升图书馆的信息服务能力有重大意义。当前5个著名的国外开放科技资源建设项目（OPENDOAR、BASE、PMC、eDOC及PLOS）在资源发现及获取、质量控制、利用机制、服务开发4个方面均可资借鉴。我国图书馆在开展开放科技资源建设时，除了要汲取国外经验，还要注重开放科技资源的评价和遴选、完善开放资源的利用机制、重视开放资源的长期保存。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment
YES